HRCRC Headquarters visit Onuayim Branch

As a grassroot oriented organization, HRCRC has spread across the 13 local government areas of the state over 25 branches. Today a team from HRCRC headquarters visited her newly formed and inaugurated branch at Onuayim Isieke branch to encourage her members.

In this fight to curb injustice and entrench human rights, whilst encouraging peaceful coexistence through conflict resolution strategies, there are numerous sacrifices and hazard. However, we are excited and convinced that this walk is for the utmost good of humanity, and we shall walk the walk.

We are grateful to our Onuayim branch for their doggedness towards this cause.

Human Rights Died on Sunday

Once upon a time we would rush out at the sound of human click sounds – imitating the very fascinating Zulu ‘X’ sound –  and the accompanying moo. It was interesting to watch how little petite very handsome curly haired Fulani boys controlled these gigantic white sluggish mammals with horns; Ah Yes, the horns! That they valued the life of the animals under their charge didn’t really stir up debates. Instead we were impressed with their smooth carved crosiers; along with the little daggers they wore around their waists like Navy Seals in full combat gear. Also, very inspiring was idea that these little dark handsome curly-haired bundles of calm confronted wild beasts in the wild regularly with their daggers to protect their mammalian wards.

I suppose the wild beasts in the wild grew more ferocious for soon, during the harmattan when the human click sounds accompanied by the moo passed by, in the stead of daggers we saw machetes not on their waists but held on their hands seemingly nonchalantly but at a ready. Then we heard on the news that they now carried riffles to protect themselves and their charge from the ever-evolving dangers of the wild. Logically following this projection, soon they may need RPGs and grenades and the likes and, in a few years, when the issue of Nigeria comes up at the UN General Assembly, President Trump and Kim of North Korea will have to shut up because their quarrel will be petite in comparison.

Collectively, from the developing world of Europe and North America to the underdeveloped of South America, some of the far and middle east and indeed Africa, we have all managed to make a pleasant mockery of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. All other inalienable right every human is entitled to just by being alive is pinged on the right to life. To pull off the hinge is to render quite redundant the door functionality of a door. If only humans beings who are alive are referred to as humans – dead ones are referred to as bodies or corpse -, and If every other right of a human is only valid because that human is alive, It therefore logically follows that by the wanton disregard and disrespect for the dignity of human life, so passionately and fantastically exhibited throughout the world today, we all have passively and actively destroyed the hinge on which all other rights revolve.

Ironically, while this rubbishing of all Human Rights in other climes have some sort of not justifiable in any sense but at least dignified push behind it, Nigeria chose to align herself with the less dignified kind of genocidal tendency; –  the ones that have an undertone reference to animals. Nigeria is proudly in the company of the likes of the Rwandan genocide – with their Cockroaches reference; but since we are the giant of Africa, why not choose a more gigantic animal – say Cows? Just why not? As if that is not enough disgrace, families and boarder communities continue to deprive people of their right to life in Ebonyi state over land disputes and sundry matters, the Izzis and Ukelles are killing themselves over something that happened before they were born; then kidnappers, cultists, ritualists, careless officers of the law, robbers – both armed and not, mob action/jungle justice and herdsmen graciously join in compounding the situation for us.

It was remarkable to read a leader make subtle comparison between the life of cattle and the life of a human being. The Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders’ Association of Nigeria was alleged to have elusively said that the murder of more than a hundred innocent persons in Plateau State was a reprisal attack for cattle rustling in the town and even threatened –  sorry, cautioned that there would be no peace in the area because of this great crime against humanity – cattle rustling. Instinctually, my first reaction was with great deference to his fundamental human right to speech and opinion, how dare he make a subtle defence of the inhumane murder of human beings right in their houses and compare it to the killing and rustling of cows, and even daring to justify his stance by saying there will be no peace. And I am sure many other southern Nigerians shared similar or even less agreeable sentiments. Eventually, this news was found to be inaccurate. The sudden proliferation of hate speeches and fake news mostly born out of stereotypes and prejudices is both unhealthy and a catalyst for disintegration and possibly annihilation. But this is an issue for another day. Today’s issue is that just like clockwork, Nigeria reacted. And this is what I have a problem with.

Whilst we moan, whimper, sniff and scream about the evolving tactics of protection employed by these curly haired shepherds, why is the government and security agencies tasked with the simple duty of protecting and securing lives of Nigerian Humans, not livestock, not learning from their positive cum negative – depending on your perspective – flux of protection? Or is that asking for too much from agencies whose sole task is securing our lives?  Why can’t we learn to value human life like they value cow life? The curly-haired handsome fellows are being proactive while the rest of us – citizens, security agencies and indeed the political class/elected government are impressively reactive.

Soon after the news of the mass killing broke, the federal government as usual condemned the attack and as usual promised to bring the perpetrators to justice, and as usual promised to prevent a recurrence, members of the ruling and political class issued statements condemning the attack, the Nigerian Air Force deployed a Mi-35P combat helicopter and an Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft to Plateau State, the Commissioner of Police was replaced, and of course social activists protested and were as usual harassed by security agents. The impressive list of reactions goes on and on and on and all combined does absolutely nothing to comfort the grieving in Plateau State, resurrect those potentials cut short who just happened to be on the wrong end of a bullet or a machete, or even from experience prevent a recurrence. In fact, a week after the initial attacks, and all the reactions and follow-up politicising of the event, it was reported that another attack, with the same MO, in the same State, and by the same suspected handsome curly-haired fellows killed Human Rights again. And in a swift reaction, the Chief Executive of the Plateau State adjusted the already imposed curfew from 10pm – 6am to 6pm – 6am.

Human Rights are not passive, they are active. They are neither good nor bad, they just are. They are beyond the scope of morals or ethics or religion or I dare say even human judgement. Since their conferment is not reactive or a result of any human effort or dependent on any human factor, it is safe to aver that the drive to safeguard them be commensurate. Like the developing world, think-tanks and intelligence agencies should come up with -if they do not have already- operational preventive plans and measures for all foreseeable conflicts and attacks that are proactive; and if they cannot, they should bloody well say so, so that we can task persons both within and without our social entity to do so.

We cannot continue to wait for attacks to claim innocent lives and then go on a show of force to quell reprisal attacks or prevent the emotionally wounded to express their natural emotional frustration and revenge tendency. The hurt will result in a vicious circle of attacks and counter attacks that can breed hate and, well it just goes downhill from there. While the hypocrisy of persons, especially Christians rejoicing over reprisal attacks is glaring, it is also emotionally understandable but out rightly condemned. The murder of Zayyan Gwandu, son of the Commissioner of SARS – Haliru Gwandu Abubakar for example is not only crazy but also senseless and irrational; and would remain this way until someone convinces me that he was among the group of first attackers. And even after then, it would be illegal to deprive him of his right to life haphazardly without due recourse to legal procedure. One can understand the lack of faith in the security and legal system in Nigeria as one of the major reasons why mob action and unjust jungle justice is prevalent.

Also, professional conflict resolution experts should be employed to help intervene in these cases and their recommendations be implemented.

The Thoughts of a Nigerian Woman

Earlier in the year, March, to be precise, a bill was put forward to the Nigerian Senate, and after thorough scrutiny, as is always the case, was rejected on the basis of religion, in that the provisions of the bill conflicted with the religious beliefs of both Christians, and Muslims, and the Nigerian constitution, as, again, a conflict of provisions ensued. This bill was the Gender and Equal Opportunities Bill. Introduced by Senator Biodun Olujimi, the bill sought the protection of Nigerian women (which, as stipulated, includes the girl child) from violence, while also providing them with the same marital rights as their male counterparts, including the widows’ rights to inherit their husbands property (Independent, 2016).

I begin with this to lay ground regarding my experience as a woman in Nigeria, and as a Nigerian woman. During my formative years, my mother always emphasised the need for our spoken english to be perfect, and proper enunciation was nagged into our subconscious. As a grown woman, I find that strangers’ first impression of me, prior to introduction, is that I must be from the US, as I am well-spoken, with an “accent”. Thus, these people, having never met me before, are inherently kinder towards me, withholding any potential misogynistic statements. They hear me as a foreigner and so, expect that my experiences, ideologies and ultimately, perspective on life, must differ from theirs.

However, once the threshold has been crossed by way of introduction, I become a Nigerian woman. While I take pride in being a Nigerian woman, I remained grossly disappointed and dissatisfied with the way our society treats us. I grew up learning about great Black women in history; Queen Amina of Zaria, Rosa Parks and Harriett Tubman, and how they, exhibited courage, bravery and strength, fighting to ensure they were granted equal rights and opportunities, fighting against the derogatory and condescension the patriarchal society sustained upon the female gender. In Northern Nigeria, however, disturbing regressive and coercive cultural norms have deliberately stifled any sort of progress, particularly for the girl child. These young girls are given off for marriage the moment they are deemed sexually mature, or as they are jokingly called, “ripe”, from ages as young as 13. For us non-Northerners on the other hand, having not being bound by such ludicrous traditions, we have the privilege to wait till more conventional ages. However, the pressure to get married is still very much thriving. As girls, form a very young age, we are expected to aspire to marriage. To view marriage as the ultimate goal; quite like the greatest achievement we, as girls, will make of ourselves – being wives, and mothers. It is nothing short of disheartening, being viewed in such a restricted light, especially as a young lady aspiring to be a successful career woman,

 

More so disheartening however, is the violence that ensues against women in Nigeria. Violence against women is not a problem exclusive to Nigeria, neither is it a new problem. The Nigerian constitution stipulates that a woman; a wife, is a property of her husband, and thus violating her, is generally viewed as allowed and acceptable by husbands. It is also held by many Nigerians, that a husband is unable to sexually assault his wife, as sex is his marriage right, and so the concept of consent grants the wife the power to deny him said right. This form of violence taking place within the family home was trivialised in the past, compared to its occurrence in public; over the last three decades, however, it has become a major social issue (Merry, 2008).

“The UN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women (DEVW), defines the term “violence against women” as: Any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or private life…Sexual violence has been defined as any sexual act, unwanted sexual comments or advances or acts to traffic women’s sexuality, using coercion, threats of harm or physical force by any person regardless of relationship to the survivor in any setting. The scope of this definition has been expanded to include forced sex, sexual coercion, rape and child abuse.” (UNESCO; Krug et al. (2002); Salesman et al. (1999): cited in Oladepo et al., 2011).

As mentioned earlier, this is not a problem exclusive to Nigeria, but there is something to be said about the religious and cultural factors that have not only hindered, but blatantly halted the necessary change that we should be moving towards.

 

My primary and secondary educations taught me that culture was a way of life of a group of people; the customs and traditions by which people lived their lives. It was also emphasised upon, however, that culture is dynamic. We were given examples of practices that were considered tradition, but are no longer customary, for example, the killing of twins in Efik culture, which was abolished by Mary Slessor. Thus it begs the question, if culture really is dynamic, why do we choose to remain stagnant, whilst rapidly resorting to the defence of culture when seeking to uphold and sustain restrictive, regressive practices?

Whenever a Nigerian woman holds the desire to pursue other aspects of her life, whilst refusing to include marriage and child-bearing as priority, she is rebuked and condemned; whenever she seeks to put herself first, cater to her mental health, and leave an abusive relationship, she is advised to “pray” and work it out with her abuser, “for the good of the children”; whenever she reports abuse, gets a divorce, or claims rights in her marital home, and is seen as “doing like onyibo” (behaving like the whites); I weep on the inside because I, as a Nigerian woman, can easily be in either, if not all of the previously mentioned situations. There is this inherent culture of victim-blaming and shaming that prevails in the Nigerian community, where victims of sexual assault are chastised and ultimately blamed for dressing indecently, or deliberately putting themselves in suggestive circumstances, and so held as the ones at fault. Towards the end of 2015, “Nigerian twitter” woke up to the death of a prominent politician, and surprisingly, with his death came the rejoicing of a secondary schoolmate of mine. She took to twitter to express this happiness and hoped that in death, he will endure the suffering and oppression that she lived through from his family. It turns out that this girl, Lotanna Igwe, commonly known as @sugabelly on Twitter, was 16 years old when she got into a relationship with one of his older sons, aged 22 at the time. The relationship, she says, got abusive, as their consensual sexual relations subsequently became aggressive and eventually devolved to coerced sex with his friends and gang rape by him, his brother and cousins. She highlighted that through it all she stayed with him because she loved him.

Lotanna was a young girl in love with a man, whom she thought felt likewise, and going by the UN definition above, was sexually abused. However, Nigerians failed to see it this way. She was ridiculed and dragged through the mud on social media. The alleged sexual offenders referred to her as an instrument of destruction. She was called loose, a whore, and an ashawo; as people believed she enjoyed it, or else she would have left the relationship. It was not all bad however, as a large number of people came to her defence, but it was evident that the masses we attempted to engage with were not as educated, forward-thinking or exposed as we were. It became clear that the women shaming Lotanna were not only less-educated, but unaware of the complexities regarding an abusive relationship. Subsequently, the discourse evolved to Nigeria’s treatment of women, in and out of marital situations. The African patriarchal society is such that there is a gender power structure, the man is the authority in the home and public space, while the woman is the lesser partner, restricted to the domestic sphere of life. Thus, it is included in the school curriculum and taught from a very young age that the woman’s duty is to cater to the needs of her husband and children, and the man, to provide from the family, as the head of the home.

Conversations regarding feminism are increasingly being held amongst the youth of Nigeria, as gender-related issues are very much prevalent, and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s famous TED talk titled, We Should All Be Feminists, enabled a great deal in stirring up these discussions. As a well-renowned female Nigerian author, Adichie’s talk challenged our socio-cultural mindset regarding gender and its prescriptions. With her focus on feminism in Nigeria, she addresses the problems that arise from gender prescriptions, and her desire to challenge this conditions, whilst also recognising that unlearning will be difficult, but a process she is up for nonetheless. Here is an excerpt I find particularly striking, as it encompasses a few of the problems that arise from said gender prescriptions:

“We must raise our daughters differently… We say to girls, ‘you can have ambition, but not too much. You should aim to be successful, but not too successful, otherwise you will threaten the man.’… Because I am female, I am expected to aspire to marriage, I am expected to make my life choices always keeping in mind that marriage is the most important; that marriage can be a source of joy, and love, and mutual support, but why do we teach girls to aspire to marriage, and we don’t teach boys the same?… We say to girls, ‘you cannot be sexual beings in the way that boys are.’” Now, marriage can be a good thing. It can be a source of joy and love and mutual support, but why do we teach girls to aspire to marriage and we don’t teach boys the same?’” (TEDx, 2013)

 

These are a few of the problematic realities we face as Nigerian women, and with the defence of culture and religion constantly serving as a saviour to the derogation, restriction and coercion prevalent, liberation for us women, to achieve the much needed gender equality, will continue to be a myth.

 

References

 

Ifejeme, S. C. (2012) ‘Gender-based domestic violence in Nigeria: a socio-legal perspective’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies 19(1) pp. 137-148 [Online] DOI:10.1177/097152151101900107 (Accessed: 30 August, 2016)

Merry, S.E. (2008) Gender Violence: A cultural perspective. London: Wiley-Blackwell

Oladepo, O., et al. (2011) ‘Factors influencing gender based violence among men and women in selected states in Nigeria’, African Journal of Reproductive Health 15(4) pp. 78-85 [Online] Available at: http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajrh/article/view/74796/65399 (Accessed: 30 August, 2016)

Payton, M. (2016) ‘Nigerian Senate votes down gender equality bill due to ‘religious beliefs’’, Independent, 17 March [Online]. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/nigerian-senate-votes-down-gender-equality-bill-due-to-religious-beliefs-a6936021.html (Accessed: 31 August, 2016)

TEDxEuston (2013) “We Should All Be Feminists” Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie [Online] Available at: http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/We-should-all-be-feminists-Chim (Accessed: 31 August, 2016)

© EAO 2016

Essential Attributes of HRs: (3) INDIVISIBILITY & INTERDEPENDENCY

Kabiru works as a security officer in the house of Dr Alabi. Although, he was hired as a ‘gateman’, there is hardly any other chores Kabiru does not do in Dr Alabi’s compound. He washes the cars (Alabi has two, Lexus Jeep and a Toyota 4Runer), does gardening and man the security post. Since he took up the job about 3 years ago, he has not had time to go anywhere. Some time last year, he indicated interest to travel home for the Salah break, but Alabi would not have it, arguing that he did not hire him to be away from his duty post. Kabiru has since shelved the idea of traveling.

What worries Kabiru about his job the most however, is not even the manner in which his movement is restricted. It is rather that his condition of work has been poor and unappealing. The security room where he is supposed to live and operates from has barely anything for comfort. The room has an old stool Kabiru had patched more than five times since he resumed work, and a matt he uses to pray and also sleep upon. The room’s window is like a pigeon hole so that staying inside is pretty much like being carried in a black Maria van.

To make matters worse, Dr Alabi has not been forthcoming with Kabiru’s N10,000 monthly pay as at when due. For about 7 months now, he has been fed one story or another as to why he should exercise patience. While Kabiru waits in patience however, Dr Alabi never misses to entertain ‘business friends’, family members and ‘associates’ to sumptuous parties and dinners at almost every turn of the weekend. It is during this type of occasion that Kabiru gets to ‘feel his Oga’. He would be served food enough to keep his mouth munching for days. And when latter he gets to request for his meagre salary, he would be told:

“Ah, Kabiru! Don’t act like we treat you bad in this house? We give you food here. Wait, in this era of economic recession, who doesn’t owe salary in this country? Abeg, wait till next week please.”
_____________________________________________

Kabiru’s fate is similar to many people in our society today. Ours is a society that cuts and separate what are individuals’ due, and then give them in piecemeal while framing it to look as if, they are actually doing the individuals really some good that deserve commendation. For instance, during the peak of late payment of salary in Nigeria, the one blamed on the recent economic recession, few governments who were managing to keep up to date were busy broadcasting on air how good and praiseworthy their principals were. They do not owe salaries. But after a check on these governments, it was discovered that these same governments owe huge backlog of emoluments due to their workers outside the statutory monthly take home, including refusal to honour promotion awarded to workers. Till date, some states are still paying piecemeal salaries, with some workers receiving almost 25% of their monthly pay.

Away from salary, dignity of labour requires that a person’s condition of work should be dignifying. This principle takes into cognisance, things like number of hours spent on work, hours given for rest and leisure, and the condition of work space, whether such supports the worker to deliver more efficiently. It also involves whether a worker has access to health package that allow him/her to enjoy good health benefits. Opportunity for workers to development their capacity, and for what is called “vertical mobility of labour” (i.e. room for promotion) also count in favour of dignifying work condition. These issues are well covered in international instruments like International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, (see Article 7, a through d). Section (d) of Article 7 particularly addresses the need for leisure, “periodic holidays with pay, as well as remuneration for public holidays”.

Although, Nigeria is a signatory to the above Covenant, both public and private employers of labour continue to selectively honour some while violating many of these rights. their argument is akin to Dr Alabi’s family. They can afford to owe workers, but not the other way around. At least, they fulfil ‘some obligations’. Unfortunately, one of the fundamental principles undergirding respect for human rights is indivisibility. Human rights are a wholesome set of fair packages which should not be selectively respected.

Why is this the case? Well, no right is more important than the other, and each right is intricately linked to the rest of others. Take for instance, the picture painted above about Kabiru and his job. You cannot begin to discuss whether his pay is more important than the condition of his work. In each category, the condition of where he works, the amount of rest he gets, and of course, his take home package, all of these things invariably affect his human dignity by adding something to it (when they are fairly supplied) or subtracting something from it (when they are not met).

Are rights interdependent then? Absolutely, yes. The health of a worker obviously affects his/her productivity and job satisfaction. Equally, capacity building can positively impact on the dignity of labour. Hence, neglecting these elements, as many employers are doing in our society, grossly negate best practice and of course, violates human rights principles.

Beyond labour, this discussion can be applied to other sectors of the society. For instance, you don’t choose to feed your children while refusing them access to education when you can afford, or you don’t praise yourself for giving food money to your wife everyday while at every slight provocation, turn her into a punching bag, or you don’t choose to seek citizens’ votes while refusing them participation in issues of governance. Human rights are indivisible and are interdependent.

Shalom!

Contributors: C. O. Ikegbunam Esq.
C. A. Nwankwo Esq.
D. A. Okoliko

Disclaimer:
This is a free educational material and not a source of legal advice. If you need any, please consult your lawyer.

HRCRC Staff having outdoor activity during their 2017 Staff Day